Skip to main content

Court turns down Imran’s plea to return defamation suit against him

PESHAWAR: A local court on Wednesday rejected an application of Prime Minister Imran Khan’s lawyer for returning a defamation lawsuit against his client contending that the court doesn’t have the jurisdiction on the matter.

Additional district and sessions judge Shah Waliullah Hamid Hashmi pronounced that the court had the jurisdiction to decide the lawsuit under the Defamation Ordinance, 2002.

The court fixed Feb 15 for next hearing asking the defendant (Imran Khan) to file response to the lawsuit of former MPA Fauzia Bibi within a fortnight.

Babar Awan, lawyer for the prime minister, had filed the application under Order 7 Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure saying the news conference addressed by his client in this respect was held in Islamabad and not in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and therefore, the court can’t hear the petition.

Syed Gufranullah Shah, lawyer for the plaintiff, had requested the court to dismiss the premier’s application insisting that the court has jurisdiction to hold hearing into the case.

Declares it has jurisdiction to decide the case

Fauzia Bibi, who was elected on reserved seats for women on the PTI’s ticket, had filed the lawsuit for the recovery of damages to the tune of Rs500 million from Mr Imran for defaming her by levelling ‘baseless’ allegations of horse trading in the Senate election.

The lawsuit was filed in June last year under the Defamation Ordinance 2002. The only defendant in the suit is PTI’s chief Imran Khan, who subsequently became Prime Minister of Pakistan.

Mr Babar Awan had contended that the news conference was addressed in Islamabad, whereas the committee constituted for taking action against the plaintiff was also constituted there.

He had added that as the cause of action arose there, it was not in the jurisdiction of the present court to deal with the case.

Mr Awan had cited several superior court judgments in support of his contentions and requested the court to return the lawsuit.

Syed Ghufranullah Shah had contended that his client was member of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly and the statement of Mr Imran was related to her stint as member of the assembly.

He added that the allegations against his client were leveled in connection of the Senate elections for which she had cast vote in the KP Assembly.

The lawyer said the Defamation Ordinance, 2002, was a special law, which had an overriding effect over other laws.

He said under that law, Peshawar’s district court was the relevant forum for hearing the defamation suit.

The lawyer said in the Senate polls held on March 3, 2018, his client had followed the party leadership’s orders to vote for its nominees for Senate’s general and reserved seats meant for women and technocrats.

He said after the Senate polls, the defendant, Imran Khan, began uttering, spreading and resorting to publication, communication and circulation of maliciously false, baseless and unfounded oral statements and representation against the plaintiff accusing her of selling her vote in the Senate elections.

Published in Dawn, January 31st, 2019



from The Dawn News - Home http://bit.ly/2DL6vBU
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IT ministry forms panel to review social media rules

ISLAMABAD: While uproar against the new rules to regulate social media continues from various segments of society, including parliamentarians, the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) and civil society, the information technology ministry on Friday formed a committee to review the rules. The federal cabinet approved the rules on Feb 11, but later after opposition from various quarters, including companies that manage different social media platforms, the prime minister announced that a fresh consultation process would be launched over the Citizens Protection (Against Online Harm) Rules 2020. The committee formed by the IT ministry is headed by Pakistan Telecommunication Authority Chairman Amir Azeem Bajwa while its members are Eazaz Aslam Dar, additional secretary of IT; Tania Aidrus, member of the Strategic Reforms Imple­mentation Unit, Prime Minister Office; and Dr Arslan Khalid, focal person on digital media at the PM Office. Federal Minister for Human Rights Dr Shireen Ma

Young girl’s tragic story makes her symbol of Yemen war

Buthaina Mansur al-Rimi’s life has changed drastically since last year — orphaned in Sanaa, the little girl controversially ended up in Saudi Arabia for medical care and has just returned to Yemen’s capital. Her entire immediate family was wiped out in an air strike by a Saudi-led coalition that backs Yemen’s government, using an explosive device Amnesty International says was made in the US. Images of Buthaina’s rescue and a picture of her swollen and bruised at a hospital trying to force open one of her eyes with her fingers were beamed worldwide. That international fame saw her become something of a propaganda pawn in the war between Yemen’s Iran-backed Huthi rebels and Saudi media. “I was in my mother’s room with my father, sisters, brother and uncle, the first missile hit, and my father went to get us sugar to get over the shock, but then the second missile hit, and then the third,” she says. “And then the house fell,” adds the little girl, who says she is eight. It was the