Skip to main content

Asset unit’s report led to cases against judges: ministry

ISLAMABAD: The law ministry has finally expla­ined that the reference against two superior court judges originated in a complaint by Prime Minister’s Special Assistant on Accou­ntability Shahzad Akbar’s Asset Recovery Unit (ARU) while the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) has convened a countrywide meeting on the explosive issue.

“The (law) ministry on its own has no mechanism to look into the assets of any judge and therefore is bound to process complaints it receives from the ARU and the Federal Board of Revenue in the best interest of the country,” a spokesman for the ministry said. He said the ministry believed in upholding the rule of law and would continue to do so.

In October last year, Mr Akbar had announced setting up of the ARU comprising officials of the National Accountability Bureau and the Federal Investigation Agency with the task of probing thousands of properties held by Pakistanis abroad.

PBC convenes meeting on June 12 to discuss issue; Pemra stops TV channels from airing discussions, analysis on matter

He had also stated that the details of over 10,000 properties owned by Pakistanis in the United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom had been received.

On the other hand, PBC vice chairman Syed Amjad Shah told Dawn that a general house meeting of Pak­istan’s regulatory body of lawyers had been called on June 12 to take stock of the situation arising out of the filing of the references against the superior court judges.

Before the June 12 meeting, a joint meeting of the representatives of national and provincial/Islamabad bar councils would be held on June 8 and 9 for prior consultation on the matters pertaining to Article 209 and 175-A of the Constitution.

Asked about general feeling among the lawyers on the filing of the references, Mr Shah said they were angry since they believed that Justice Qazi Faez Isa of the Supreme Court was being discriminated against and victimised with mala fide intent.

Likewise, Supreme Court Bar Association president Amanullah Kanrani told reporters that to show solidarity with Justice Isa, lawyers would congregate at the Supreme Court building when the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) took up the reference on June 14.

Meanwhile, the spokesperson for the law ministry denied that federal Law Minister Barrister Dr Mohammad Farogh Naseem was the mastermind and the initiator of the reference against the senior judge of the Supreme Court.

Describing the impression as malicious news, the spokesman also contradic­ted that the ministry had changed the language of the reference on the instructions of President Dr Arif Alvi as the language of the original reference was harsh.

In a related development, the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Autho­rity (Pemra) has restrained television channels from airing news, discussion or analysis on the issue except the news on the reference filed by the government against the judges for allegedly owning properties abroad.

Citing the July 7, 2018 judgement of the Supreme Court, Pemra recalled that through the judgement directives were issued to media that no media discussion, articles or editorials would be written or published and no public comments would be made on the proceedings of the Supreme Judicial Council and only the proceedings would be reported.

Moreover, the Supreme Court through Sept 12, 2018 suo motu case had also prohibited discussions on sub judice matters.

According to Pemra, this judgement necessitated that all the license holders comply with the Electronic Media (Programme and Advertisement Code of Conduct) 2015 in letter and spirit and obligated the authority to take punitive action as per the law without extending any relaxation.

The verdict had explained that any discussion on a matter which was sub judice could be aired but only to the extent that it was to provide objective information to the public and no content including commentary, opinions or suggestions about the potential fate of such subjudice matter which tended to prejudice the determination by a court or tribunal etc would be aired.

Pemra warned that in case of non-compliance, the authority would proceed in accordance with the Pemra Ordinance 2002.

Published in Dawn, June 1st, 2019



from The Dawn News - Home http://bit.ly/30VxFj2
via IFTTT
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

IT ministry forms panel to review social media rules

ISLAMABAD: While uproar against the new rules to regulate social media continues from various segments of society, including parliamentarians, the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) and civil society, the information technology ministry on Friday formed a committee to review the rules. The federal cabinet approved the rules on Feb 11, but later after opposition from various quarters, including companies that manage different social media platforms, the prime minister announced that a fresh consultation process would be launched over the Citizens Protection (Against Online Harm) Rules 2020. The committee formed by the IT ministry is headed by Pakistan Telecommunication Authority Chairman Amir Azeem Bajwa while its members are Eazaz Aslam Dar, additional secretary of IT; Tania Aidrus, member of the Strategic Reforms Imple­mentation Unit, Prime Minister Office; and Dr Arslan Khalid, focal person on digital media at the PM Office. Federal Minister for Human Rights Dr Shireen Ma
Post a Comment
Read more

Young girl’s tragic story makes her symbol of Yemen war

Buthaina Mansur al-Rimi’s life has changed drastically since last year — orphaned in Sanaa, the little girl controversially ended up in Saudi Arabia for medical care and has just returned to Yemen’s capital. Her entire immediate family was wiped out in an air strike by a Saudi-led coalition that backs Yemen’s government, using an explosive device Amnesty International says was made in the US. Images of Buthaina’s rescue and a picture of her swollen and bruised at a hospital trying to force open one of her eyes with her fingers were beamed worldwide. That international fame saw her become something of a propaganda pawn in the war between Yemen’s Iran-backed Huthi rebels and Saudi media. “I was in my mother’s room with my father, sisters, brother and uncle, the first missile hit, and my father went to get us sugar to get over the shock, but then the second missile hit, and then the third,” she says. “And then the house fell,” adds the little girl, who says she is eight. It was the
Post a Comment
Read more