Skip to main content

Can Baghdadi save Trump?

PRESIDENT Donald Trump could barely contain himself. On the evening of Saturday, Oct 26, he couldn’t stop himself from tweeting a hint: “Something very big has just happened!” he announced cryptically on Twitter. Most Americans were likely not paying attention to what the president was saying, used as they would have become to the copious amounts of nothingness that their commander-in-chief puts out on a daily, even hourly, basis.

The “something very big” was a United States Delta Force raid on a compound in Idlib in northern Syria. It was Sunday morning by the time President Trump could deliver his official address. It was, unsurprisingly, full of hyperbole and blather. The president stated that the self-styled ‘Islamic State’ leader had died a coward’s death and was “whimpering and crying” towards the end.

Read: Islamic State leader Baghdadi died 'in panic and dread', says Trump

Then, in a near 46-minute free-wheeling exchange with the media that had been gathered, he opined on many other things. This included but was not limited to the fact that he had been the first and only person to point out that Osama Bin Laden had been a terrorist and needed to be taken out — but that no one had listened to him. And, of course, no Trump press conference could conclude without a reiteration of his superiority over all other presidents. This raid and operation, Trump pointed out, was more important than the raid that led to the killing of Osama Bin Laden.

No Trump press conference could conclude without a reiteration of his superiority over all other presidents.

In the initial few hours after the raid, it seemed that the operation in which Abu Bakar al-Baghdadi died had saved Donald Trump. In dire straits, with an impeachment inquiry under way and increasingly damning proof surfacing regarding his underhand dealings with Ukraine (he appears to have asked Ukraine to investigate his electoral rival Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden), Trump definitely needed something miraculous to deliver him.

A raid in Syria during which the ‘most wanted living terrorist’ died seemed to be just the thing that would (like Osama Bin Laden’s raid did for President Obama) deliver the boost required to win a second term. The aesthetics seemed designed for just that. Obama’s post-raid photos showed the president huddling with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and others while watching the raid. President Trump’s post-raid photos showed him sitting at the head of a stately conference table surrounded by his slew of advisers and secretaries, all looking presumably at the live feed of the raid as it took place.

Yet even though the event had all the ingredients of a huge political win, the Baghdadi raid seems to have fallen flat, unable to provide the boost that was required.

Proof came just that evening. On Sunday night, President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump attended a World Series baseball game. The Washington Nationals, DC’s local team, was playing the Houston Astros. A crowd estimated at nearly 50,000 people was in attendance. And yet at the end of the third innings, when President Trump was introduced, the entire stadium began to boo the president. If that were not enough, the booing was followed up with loud chants of “Lock him up”, a variation on the chant that Trump supporters use in relation to Hillary Clinton at Trump rallies. If the stadium was at all a sample of Americans, Trump was disliked, even detested, whether or not he had caught Baghdadi or anyone else.

The reception of the Baghdadi raid by the US foreign policy establishment has also been interesting. Analysts from a variety of think tanks, the people who make up the terrorist analysis industrial complex (that has grown into a behemoth in the 18 years since the 9/11 attack), seemed terribly circumspect in their statements. Unlike the cooing and self-congratulation post-Bin Laden, many pointed out that terror networks and organisations are not eliminated if a leader is killed. At least one pointed out that it was incorrect to claim that the Americans had got Baghdadi when in fact he had killed himself using a suicide vest.

For the world beyond the US, both the circumspection and the lack of attention and admiration for the raid are positive things. While it is indeed a cause for celebration that a cruel man like Baghdadi is dead, the fact that high-profile killings of terrorists are no longer yielding enormous political dividends at home suggests that the US terror policy can finally move away from its obsession with high-value targets. Terrorism analysts in Pakistan have repeatedly pointed out the questionable nature of decapitating leadership, but the US had to come to the realisation on its own and in its own time.

Even though the Baghdadi raid will not deliver Trump from his increasing unpopularity with his electorate, conducting such raids will become a fixture of every American presidency for its potential to yield political successes. Terrorism, as Pakistanis know, is not something that can be eliminated, only something that can be managed and contained. In the aftermath of the raid, the US Special Forces destroyed the compound and took Baghdadi’s remains with them. They were, like those of Osama Bin Laden, buried at sea, except for the parts that have been used for DNA testing.

In the coming months, as the campaign for the next US presidency heats up, President Trump will undoubtedly claim that he has singlehandedly defeated the IS. Based on the first few days following the death of the most wanted man in the world, it appears that Americans, who will vote for a new president in almost exactly one year, are not impressed.

The writer is an attorney teaching constitutional law and political philosophy.

rafia.zakaria@gmail.com

Published in Dawn, October 30th, 2019



from The Dawn News - Home https://ift.tt/2Wm2ATU
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rouhani calls Imran, discusses resumption of trade

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan and Iran on Wednesday discussed full resumption of bilateral trade, which was halted last month because of the Covid-19 pandemic. “The two sides stressed the need to reactivate borders and border markets and strengthen trade ties by following health guidelines,” a statement issued by the Iranian presidency on the telephonic conversation between Prime Minister Imran Khan and President Dr Hassan Rouhani said. President Rouhani had called the prime minister for Ramazan greetings. Border trade between the two countries was suspended after a meeting of the National Security Committee (NSC), held on March 13, decided to close all borders because of the pandemic. Islamabad partially relaxed the restrictions on April 21, allowing the import of certain food items and provision of petrol and diesel to the border areas. Cargo traffic from Iran was allowed for three days every week. Cargo movement between the two countries takes place through five border crossings — Taftan...

Today’s outlook: Sindh CM discusses reopening markets with PM Khan

Here are some of the stories we are expecting to follow today (Thursday): Sindh Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah will take Prime Minister Imran Khan into confidence over reopening shops and markets across the province. The reopened markets will have to follow SOPs. Sindh Transport Minister Awais Qadir Shah will discuss SOPs with transporters for resuming public transport in the coming days. The meeting will be held at the Sindh Assembly building at 1:30pm. The Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority has proposed a price cut of Rs20.68 per litre for petrol in its summary. Imam-e-Kaaba Sheikh Abdul Rahman Al-Sudais has said Masjid Al Haram and Masjid Al Nabawi will be reopened for worshipers soon. He said the Kaaba is being sterilised using latest technologies. Punjab Chief Minister Usman Buzdar will head various meetings during his visit to Bahawalpur. As of Thursday, Pakistan has reported more than 15,500 confirmed coronavirus cases. ICYMI: An amendment to the National Accountability Or...

If Pakistani elderly self-distance infections could drop 30%: study

If we do nothing, COVID-19 could infect 206 million Pakistanis and kill 691,000. This is the estimation of researchers from the Imperial College London COVID-19 Response Team who have published country-wise projections in a March 26 report ‘ The Global Impact of COVID-19 and Strategies for Mitigation and Suppression ’ Furthermore, using an infection fatality rate from China, this means 4.4 million Pakistanis would require hospitalisation and from among those, 917,000 individuals would require critical care. Pakistan has a population of 220 million people. The research is based on the infection fatality rate from China, country health care system capacities and that one person with coronavirus is likely to infect 3 others. (You can find the excel sheet with Pakistan numbers here: Imperial-College-COVID19-Global-unmitigated-mitigated-suppression-scenarios.xlsx ) Forty-seven researchers crunched the numbers and made these projections to give countries, including Pakistan, some idea of...