Skip to main content

Opposition seeks parliamentary debate on new NAB law

ISLAMABAD: Assailing the ruling Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) for promulgating the controversial National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Amendment Ordinance, the country’s major opposition parties have asked the government to bring the newly-introduced ordinance to parliament for debate.

The leaders of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) and the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) are alleging that the government has introduced the ordinance to stop NAB from probing mega-corruption cases involving the present government.

PML-N’s information secretary Marriyum Aurang­zeb said in a statement on Sunday that her party had rejected Prime Minister Imran Khan’s NAB Ordi­nance which, she said, had been brought to dry-clean the PTI government and to halt all inquiries into their mega corruption scandals.

The ordinance, she said, was a recipe cooked by the “selected prime minister to grant limitless NROs to his blue-eyed beneficiaries and his corrupt regime”.

Alleges amendments have been made to save PM, his cronies and allies

Ms Aurangzeb said the “so-called prime minister” boasted of the bill being businessmen-friendly but in essence it went against their interests and only sought to guard corruption of his friends. This, she said, was the biggest deception and fraud with the business community of the country.

“If the government was so committed to benefit the businesses, it would have brought a permanent legislation through parliament instead of a temporary ordinance,” she said.

The PML-N leader said the fact that the NAB Ordinance was not brought in front of the parliamentary committee proved the government’s ill intentions.

“If Imran and his regime is honest and has done no wrong, why did he conjure up this new standard of accountability for his government after grilling the opposition through previous laws, and why is he trying to use this to shut down probes into his projects who are already knee-deep in corruption?” she questioned.

Speaking at a news conference, PPP Central Punjab president Qamar Zaman Kaira opposed the idea of challenging the controversial ordinance in courts and urged the government to bring the controversial ordinance before parliament in the form of proper legislation.

“We don’t want to take every matter to courts. We want to talk in the parliament,” said Mr Kaira in reply to a question.

The PPP leader, however, declared that he could not state the “final stance” of his party as it had so far not discussed the matter. He said the PPP leadership and its legal team were currently reviewing the ordinance.

Terming the issuance of the ordinance another U-turn of Imran Khan, Mr Kaira alleged that the ­government had brought this ordinance only to save the prime minister, his cronies and allies.

He said NAB could not hold accountability of the government people, judiciary, army, bureaucracy and businessmen, and the Bureau was there only to carry out the accountability of the PPP and PML-N.

When Mr Kaira’s attention was drawn to media reports that the opposition members, including former president Asif Zardari and his sister Faryal Talpur, would also benefit from the new ordinance, he said it would be premature to talk about it.

Moreover, he said, the opposition members were already facing trials in different courts, including high courts and special courts. He said the comments and remarks given by the courts in their decisions while granting bails to the opposition leaders were before everyone.

The PPP leader alleged that the main purpose of the new ordinance was to stop NAB from taking up scams like Malam Jabba and Peshawar BRT (Bus Rapid Transport).

He said that Imran Khan would soon be taking “the last U-turn” of his political life and he would go from where he had been sent to do politics.

“When the need of the selected ends, then the selec­ted [people] are allowed to take a last U-turn,” the PPP leader said.

PPP Central Punjab Secretary General Chau­dhry Manzoor Ahmed, Senator Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar and party’s media coordinator Nazir Dhoki were also present in the news conference.

Published in Dawn, December 30th, 2019



from The Dawn News - Home https://ift.tt/2QBFB4S
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IT ministry forms panel to review social media rules

ISLAMABAD: While uproar against the new rules to regulate social media continues from various segments of society, including parliamentarians, the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) and civil society, the information technology ministry on Friday formed a committee to review the rules. The federal cabinet approved the rules on Feb 11, but later after opposition from various quarters, including companies that manage different social media platforms, the prime minister announced that a fresh consultation process would be launched over the Citizens Protection (Against Online Harm) Rules 2020. The committee formed by the IT ministry is headed by Pakistan Telecommunication Authority Chairman Amir Azeem Bajwa while its members are Eazaz Aslam Dar, additional secretary of IT; Tania Aidrus, member of the Strategic Reforms Imple­mentation Unit, Prime Minister Office; and Dr Arslan Khalid, focal person on digital media at the PM Office. Federal Minister for Human Rights Dr Shireen Ma

Young girl’s tragic story makes her symbol of Yemen war

Buthaina Mansur al-Rimi’s life has changed drastically since last year — orphaned in Sanaa, the little girl controversially ended up in Saudi Arabia for medical care and has just returned to Yemen’s capital. Her entire immediate family was wiped out in an air strike by a Saudi-led coalition that backs Yemen’s government, using an explosive device Amnesty International says was made in the US. Images of Buthaina’s rescue and a picture of her swollen and bruised at a hospital trying to force open one of her eyes with her fingers were beamed worldwide. That international fame saw her become something of a propaganda pawn in the war between Yemen’s Iran-backed Huthi rebels and Saudi media. “I was in my mother’s room with my father, sisters, brother and uncle, the first missile hit, and my father went to get us sugar to get over the shock, but then the second missile hit, and then the third,” she says. “And then the house fell,” adds the little girl, who says she is eight. It was the