Skip to main content

SC asked to set aside IHC order rejecting plea against Zulfi Bukhari

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court was requested on Monday to set aside the March 30 order of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) that had rejected a plea against the prime minister’s aide Syed Zulfiqar Abbas Bukhari, popularly known as Zulfi Bukhari, for his alleged role in allowing pilgrims to enter Pakistan without undergoing mandatory quarantine.

The Civil Society of Pakistan organisation moved the petition before the SC through advocate Tariq Asad, seeking leave to appeal against the March 30 IHC order.

The high court had dismissed the earlier petition, saying that it was not the time to raise controversies or to doubt the intention of the state and its functionaries in meeting the challenges posed by the coronavirus pandemic.

The high court, while dismissing the petition, had also highlighted the need to remain united and trust the state and its functionaries, saying the jurisdiction of the high court could not be exercised for initiating inquiries.

Petition says PM aide’s alleged role in allowing return of pilgrims from border caused spread of Covid-19

In response, the petitioner pleaded before the SC that instead of hearing the parties and considering their arguments, the IHC chief justice recorded his personal views and estimation in dismissing the petition.

This was done at a time when the SC, the petition argued, in an identical matter had considered this issue to be of great public importance.

The controversy stems from the fact when Special Assistant to the Prime Minister on Overseas Pakistanis and Human Resource Development Zulfi Bukhari allegedly used his influence to allow ‘Zaireen’ (pilgrims) from Iran to enter Pakistan from the Taftan border, without completing the 14-day quarantine requirement, after Iran allegedly ordered Pakistani pilgrims to leave the country.

The petition regretted that the government of Pakistan too failed to exercise diplomatic channels and influence over the neighbouring country to keep the pilgrims with it for a while and provide them with facilities in view of the prevailing situation.

Instead the pilgrims from Iran were shifted from the Taftan border to different cities of Pakistan, including Multan, Sukkur and Faisalabad, the petition alleged.

These areas, before the shifting of the pilgrim, were not affected by the coronavirus pandemic, the petition alleged.

When it was decided to shift 3,000 pilgrims out of the total of 9,000 from Taftan to Faisalabad and keep them in the hostels of the Agriculture University, the petition recalled, the IHC was approached to seek a directive that the pilgrims should not be allowed to move to Faisalabad, which then was not afflicted with the pandemic.

Instead of controlling the spread of the deadly virus, the petition alleged, the government unfortunately allowed the pilgrims to move to Faisalabad.

The petition highlighted that the purpose of moving the plea before the high court was to ensure that the lives of the people of this country, irrespective of their cast or creed, remained protected.

Emergency-like situation

The petition was filed in the high court as the pilgrims were returning back directly from a country which was badly affected by the coronavirus outbreak and that too without any medical test. Their arrival had created an emergency-like situation in the city.

Thus, the petition argued, the government failed to take proper measures in time to control the pandemic. It was a constitutional obligation of the federal government to properly quarantine persons coming from infected areas like China, Iran, Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States.

The petition also highlighted that even the country like Afghanistan timely sealed its borders that helped it in controlling the spread of the deadly virus.

The petition argued that the high court order was not in accordance with the law, adding that the government had failed to control the spread of the disease.

The petition alleged that some immature cabinet members were taking irrational steps.

The petition regretted that the IHC’s decision to dismiss the petition in such a manner on an important national issue of great public importance amounted to deny the exercise of jurisdiction vested in the high court under Article 199 of the Constitution and thus the high court acted entirely prejudicial to the interest of justice, law and the Constitution.

Published in Dawn, April 28th, 2020



from The Dawn News - Home https://ift.tt/3bEz3LX
via IFTTT
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Trump says he urged team to ‘slow’ COVID-19 testing

US President Donald Trump said Saturday he was encouraging health officials in his administration to slow down coronavirus testing, arguing that increased tests lead to more cases being discovered. The president has claimed falsely on several occasions that surges of COVID-19 in several states can be explained by greater numbers of diagnostic tests. At his first rally since the outbreak forced nationwide shutdowns in March, Trump told the crowd in Tulsa, Oklahoma that testing was a “double-edged sword.” The United States — which has more deaths and cases than any other country — has carried out more than 25 million coronavirus tests, placing it outside the top 20 countries in the world, per capita. “Here is the bad part: When you do testing to that extent, you are going to find more people, you will find more cases,” Trump argued. “So I said to my people ‘slow the testing down.’ They test and they test.” It was not clear from Trump’s tone if he was playing to the crowd, who ...
Post a Comment
Read more

IT ministry forms panel to review social media rules

ISLAMABAD: While uproar against the new rules to regulate social media continues from various segments of society, including parliamentarians, the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) and civil society, the information technology ministry on Friday formed a committee to review the rules. The federal cabinet approved the rules on Feb 11, but later after opposition from various quarters, including companies that manage different social media platforms, the prime minister announced that a fresh consultation process would be launched over the Citizens Protection (Against Online Harm) Rules 2020. The committee formed by the IT ministry is headed by Pakistan Telecommunication Authority Chairman Amir Azeem Bajwa while its members are Eazaz Aslam Dar, additional secretary of IT; Tania Aidrus, member of the Strategic Reforms Imple­mentation Unit, Prime Minister Office; and Dr Arslan Khalid, focal person on digital media at the PM Office. Federal Minister for Human Rights Dr Shireen Ma...
Post a Comment
Read more

IS confirms Baghdadi’s death, vows revenge

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.—AP BEIRUT: The Islamic State militant group confirmed the death of its leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in a statement on Thursday and named his replacement as Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Quraishi. “We mourn you ... commander of the faithful,” said Abu Hamza al-Quraishi — presented as the group’s new spokesman — in an audio statement. Baghdadi, who led IS since 2014 and was the world’s most wanted man, was killed in a US special forces raid in Syria’s province of Idlib on Sunday. The group also confirmed the killing in another raid the following day of the group’s previous spokesman Abu Hassan al-Muhajir. The statement said the group’s legislative and consultative body convened after the 48-year-old Iraqi-born jihadist chief’s death. “The Islamic State shura council convened immediately after confirming the martyrdom of Sheikh Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, and the elders of the holy warriors agreed” on a replacement, said the seven-minute message. Little is known abou...
Post a Comment
Read more